The Industry 5.0 Paradox: Why the Greenest Machine is the One You Already Own

A dangerous myth is circulating in the manufacturing sector right now: "To be sustainable, we must rip out old machines and buy new ones."

This is false. And from a Circular Economy perspective, it’s wasteful.

True Industry 5.0 isn't about buying shiny new assets; it’s about Retrofitting, giving your existing, reliable machinery a "digital brain" to extend its lifecycle and optimize its energy use.

Did you know that Retrofitting your legacy equipment with IIoT sensors often yields a higher ROI than buying new?

1. Lower CapEx: You spend a fraction of the cost of a new machine.

2. Sustainability: You avoid the massive carbon footprint associated with manufacturing and shipping new heavy machinery.

Revitalising Legacy Assets with Snaption

You don't need to replace the iron to upgrade the intelligence. Snaption specializes in Non-Invasive Retrofitting:

✅ Clamp-On Sensors: we deploy wireless sensors that attach to your existing motors and pumps, no downtime, no warranty voids.

✅ Protocol Translation: our gateways translate legacy PLC data into modern MQTT streams.

✅ Data-driven decisions: We deliver machine-level insights that support fast and precise decisions on performance, bottlenecks, and corrective actions.

✅ Process control and quality assurance: We use machine data to verify product quality, monitor deviations, and cut waste, helping you reduce costs and get more value from your production systems.

Don’t scrap your heritage. Digitize it!

The Strategic Imperative of Retrofitting in the Age of Sustainable Intelligence

The global industrial landscape is currently navigating a profound structural transformation, moving from the connectivity-driven paradigm of Industry 4.0 toward the human-centric, sustainable, and resilient framework of Industry 5.0. Within this shift, a dangerous and pervasive myth has taken root among manufacturing executives: the belief that achieving sustainability and digitalisation requires the wholesale scrapping of legacy assets in favour of new, state-of-the-art machinery.

This post rigorously challenges that orthodoxy, sustaining that the most environmentally sustainable and economically viable strategy is often to "retrofit" existing equipment.

By endowing heritage "iron" with a modern "digital brain," manufacturers can achieve the dual goals of decarbonization and digitalisation without incurring the massive carbon debt associated with manufacturing new capital goods. Numerous analyses indicate that the production of new industrial machinery is a highly carbon-intensive process, often accounting for a substantial portion of an asset's total lifetime emissions.¹ Consequently, replacing a functional machine with a marginally more efficient new model frequently results in a net-negative environmental impact for decades, a phenomenon we term the "Green Paradox of Modernisation." In contrast, retrofitting strategies, particularly those utilising non-invasive Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) technologies like clamp-on sensors and protocol translation gateways, extend the useful life of assets, thereby diverting waste from landfills and drastically reducing raw material consumption by up to 90%.³

Companies that leverage non-invasive retrofitting technologies, such as those pioneered by Snaption, can secure immediate compliance with European energy directives, unlock significant fiscal liquidity, and operationalise the core tenets of Industry 5.0: resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity.

The Philosophical and Practical Shift: From Industry 4.0 to 5.0

To understand why retrofitting has evolved from a maintenance tactic to a boardroom strategy, one must first appreciate the fundamental shift in the industrial paradigm. Industry 4.0 was characterised by a technocratic obsession with automation, data exchange, and the "Smart Factory." It viewed the human worker primarily as a source of error and the machine as the source of truth. However, the disruptions of the 2020s, pandemic-induced supply chain collapses, energy crises, and geopolitical instability exposed the fragility of hyper-optimised, fully automated systems.

The Definition of Industry 5.0

The European Commission defines Industry 5.0 not as a replacement for 4.0, but as a necessary correction and evolution. It is built upon three non-negotiable pillars that fundamentally alter the ROI calculation for industrial assets:

1. Sustainability: Industrial production must respect planetary boundaries. This goes beyond simple energy efficiency to encompass circularity, biodiversity protection, and the reduction of embodied carbon.⁴

2. Human-Centricity: Technology must serve the worker, not vice versa. Instead of replacing operators, technology should augment their capabilities, improve their safety, and reduce their cognitive load.⁵

3. Resilience: Production systems must be robust enough to withstand systemic shocks, ensuring strategic autonomy and continuity of supply.⁵

The Role of Retrofitting in the New Paradigm

Retrofitting aligns more closely with these pillars than the "rip-and-replace" model. From a resilience perspective, maintaining and upgrading existing mechanical systems, which are often over-engineered and robust, reduces dependence on fragile global supply chains for new machines, which currently suffer from lead times of 12 to 30 weeks.⁶ From a human-centric standpoint, retrofitting allows veteran operators to continue utilising machinery they have mastered, while the "digital overlay" (sensors and dashboards) handles the tedious tasks of data logging and monitoring, thereby reducing stress and enhancing decision-making without rendering their skills obsolete.⁶

Most critically, from a sustainability perspective, retrofitting embodies the Circular Economy. It rejects the linear "take-make-waste" model in favour of "retention-upgrade-reuse." By extending the service life of a machine by 5 to 10 years, a manufacturer effectively slashes the annualised carbon footprint of that asset.⁸ This report will demonstrate that true Industry 5.0 innovation is not about the newness of the hardware, but the intelligence of its operation.

The Carbon Calculus: Embodied vs. Operational Emissions

A central thesis of this report is that the manufacturing sector suffers from a "Carbon Tunnel Vision," focusing almost exclusively on Operational Carbon (the energy used to run a machine) while ignoring Embodied Carbon (the energy used to build it). To make genuinely sustainable decisions, we must analyse the full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of industrial assets.

The Physics of Embodied Carbon in Heavy Industry

Industrial machinery is material-intensive. It is composed largely of cast iron, steel, copper, and aluminium, materials that require immense amounts of energy to extract, smelt, and refine. Research indicates that the production of machinery and equipment accounts for approximately 30% of global metal production and 8% of global carbon emissions.¹

When a manufacturer purchases a new CNC machine, injection moulder, or industrial press, they are inheriting a massive "carbon backpack."

• Extraction & Refining: The mining of iron ore and the production of steel via blast furnaces are among the most carbon-intensive industrial processes on Earth.

• Manufacturing: The casting of heavy machine beds (to ensure stability and precision) involves heating tons of metal to melting points, consuming gigajoules of energy.¹⁰

• Logistics: These machines, often weighing tens of tons, must be transported, frequently across oceans, adding a significant logistics carbon footprint.¹¹

LCA studies comparing manufacturing technologies reveal that the manufacturing phase of a machine tool can generate emissions equivalent to years of its operation, particularly for heavy-duty equipment.¹² For example, a study on CNC machines found that the environmental burden of the "system" (production of the machine and its materials) is a major contributor to the total footprint.¹⁰

The Payback Period Fallacy

The "dangerous myth" suggests that new machines are so much more efficient that they quickly offset their manufacturing footprint. Data suggests otherwise.

While modern motors and drives are indeed more efficient, the gains are incremental—often in the range of 5-10% compared to a well-maintained older machine equipped with a retrofit Variable Frequency Drive (VFD). ¹³

If a new machine saves 5 tons of CO2 per year in electricity but requires 100 tons of CO2 to manufacture, the "Carbon Payback Period" is 20 years. Given that technology cycles are shortening, the machine might be viewed as obsolete before it has even paid off its carbon debt.

In contrast, a retrofit project might generate 500 kg of embodied carbon (production of sensors, gateways, and cabling) to achieve nearly the same operational savings. The payback period for the retrofit is measured in weeks, not decades.²

Table 1: Environmental Impact Comparison – Retrofit vs. Replacement

Impact Category	Retrofit / Revamping Strategy	New Machine Replacement Strategy	Circular Economy Implication
Raw Material Usage	Low: Limited to electronics, wiring, and small mechanical adaptors.	High: Requires tons of virgin steel, copper, and rare earth metals.	Retrofitting reduces raw material demand by 80-90%.3
Manufacturing Energy	Negligible: Production of sensors and small IT components.	High: Casting, forging, and machining of heavy structural bases.	Retrofitting consumes 65-87% less energy in the production phase.3
Waste Generation	Minimal: Electronic waste from old PLCs or drives.	Massive: Disposal of the entire legacy machine structure (often 5-20 tons).	Retrofitting diverts 70-90% of potential waste from landfills.12
Transportation	Low: Courier shipping of sensors and gateways.	High: Heavy freight/specialized logistics for oversized machinery.	Significant reduction in logistics-related Scope 3 emissions.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Methodologies

To rigorously quantify these benefits, manufacturers must employ LCA methodologies standardised by ISO 14040/14044.¹⁴

• Cradle-to-Gate: This measures the impact from raw material extraction to the factory door. For a new machine, this is the "Embodied Carbon" discussed above.

• Cradle-to-Grave: This includes the use phase and end-of-life disposal.

• The Retrofit Delta: When performing a comparative LCA, the "Retrofit" scenario starts with a baseline embodied carbon of zero for the machine structure (since it already exists). The analysis only counts the added components. This gives the retrofit option an insurmountable head start in any sustainability calculation.¹⁸

Case studies in the building sector, a close analogue for heavy industry, show that retrofitting reduces emissions by nearly 50% compared to demolition and reconstruction.¹⁸ In the domain of machine tools, extending the lifespan of a product by 50% (e.g., from 10 to 15 years) can reduce annual carbon emissions by up to 28%.⁸

The Economic Argument: Financial Resilience and ROI

While sustainability is the moral imperative, economics is the practical driver. In the current high-interest-rate environment, the financial case for retrofitting is compelling. It offers a path to modernisation that preserves liquidity and delivers a faster Return on Investment (ROI).

CapEx vs. OpEx: The Cost Structure Analysis

Purchasing new machinery involves significant Capital Expenditure (CapEx). The list price of the machine is just the beginning. The "Total Cost of Acquisition" includes:

• Decommissioning: Cost to remove and dispose of the old machine.

• Site Prep: Foundation reinforcement, new electrical drops, and layout changes.

• Logistics: Heavy haulage and rigging fees.

• Commissioning: Weeks of setup, calibration, and testing.

Retrofitting, by comparison, typically costs 40% to 70% less than the price of a new machine.²⁰ For a specialised industrial oven or a large CNC mill, this difference can amount to hundreds of thousands of francs.¹⁸ Furthermore, retrofitting projects can often be structured as Operational Expenditure (OpEx) or smaller CapEx projects, which are easier to approve in restrictive budget cycles.

The Hidden Costs of New Machinery

A frequently overlooked factor is the Operational Disruption Cost.

• Lead Times: Post-pandemic, the lead time for new industrial equipment has ballooned to 12–30 weeks.⁶ During this period, the manufacturer is stuck with the status quo.

• Training & Adaptation: New machines come with new Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs) and operational quirks. The "learning curve" results in a dip in productivity that can last for months as operators adapt.

• Integration Risks: New machines may not communicate natively with existing MES (Manufacturing Execution Systems) or legacy lines, requiring expensive custom integration.

• 
  

Retrofitting avoids these pitfalls. The "iron" remains familiar to the operators. The "digital brain" (sensors and dashboards) is an additive layer that provides insights without forcing a change in the core mechanical process. The installation of non-invasive sensors (like Snaption’s) can often be completed in days or even hours, minimizing downtime.⁷

Table 2: Financial & Operational Comparison

Factor	Retrofitting / Digital Upgrade	New Machine Purchase	Strategic Advantage
Capital Cost	Low: ~30-60% of new asset price.	High: 100% + Installation costs.	Immediate liquidity preservation.
Time-to-Value	Fast: Installation in days/weeks.	Slow: Procurement lead times of months.	Faster realization of efficiency gains.
Training Burden	Low: Mechanics remain unchanged.	High: New interfaces and workflows.	Workforce stability and morale.
Risk Profile	Low: Known mechanical stability.	Medium: "Teething problems" of new tech.	Operational continuity.
ROI Horizon	Short: Often < 12 months.	Long: Multi-year depreciation.	Better internal rate of return (IRR).

Technical Architecture: The "Non-Invasive" Digital Overlay

The barrier to retrofitting has traditionally been technical risk. Plant managers fear that touching a 20-year-old PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) will cause the "house of cards" to collapse, void warranties, or create safety hazards. The solution, championed by companies like Snaption, is Non-Invasive Retrofitting. This approach treats the machine as a "black box," extracting data from the outside without interfering with the internal control logic.

The Physics of Non-Invasive Sensing

How do we digitise a machine without plugging into its brain?

1. Clamp-On Current Transformers (CTs): These sensors utilise the principle of electromagnetic induction. By clamping a ferrite core around the power cable of a motor, the sensor detects the magnetic field generated by the current flow.¹⁹

2. Data Inference: Algorithms can analyse the waveform to determine not just energy consumption (kWh), but also machine state (Idle vs. Active), cycle time (duration of current spikes), and load factor.

3. Vibration Analysis (MEMS & Piezo): Wireless vibration sensors attached to motor housings use Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) accelerometers to measure oscillation.³³

4. Spectral Analysis: By performing a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) on the vibration data, the system can identify specific fault signatures (e.g., bearing wear at specific frequencies, misalignment, or imbalance) long before the machine fails.

5. Galvanic Isolation: Since these sensors do not make electrical contact with the machine's conductors, they provide total galvanic isolation. This ensures that the retrofit cannot introduce electrical noise or surges into the legacy machine's sensitive electronics.

Protocol Translation: The Digital Rosetta Stone

Once data is captured, it must be moved to the cloud or a local server. Legacy machines, if they speak at all, use archaic serial protocols like Modbus RTU or Profibus. Modern IT systems speak TCP/IP and REST APIs.

• The IoT Gateway: The heart of the retrofit is an intelligent gateway that acts as a translator. It ingests raw signals (analog 4-20mA or Serial Modbus) and converts them into modern, lightweight protocols like MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport).²³

• Why MQTT? Unlike HTTP (used for websites), MQTT is a "publish-subscribe" protocol designed for unstable networks and low bandwidth. It is ideal for industrial environments where Wi-Fi might be spotty.

• Cybersecurity: The gateway plays a crucial defensive role. It can be configured for unidirectional data flow or use encrypted tunnels (TLS 1.2/1.3), ensuring that connecting a 1990s machine to the internet does not create a backdoor for hackers.³⁴

Energy Dashboarding and EnPIs

To satisfy the GSE and drive real insights, raw data is processed into Energy Performance Indicators (EnPIs).

• The Math of Efficiency: It is not enough to know that a machine used 100 kWh. You must know it used "0.5 kWh per widget produced." This requires integrating the energy data (from Snaption sensors) with production data (from cycle counts or manual entry).

• Regression Analysis: Advanced dashboards use regression models to normalize energy use against variables like outside temperature (for HVAC) or production volume.³⁵ This allows the system to calculate the "counterfactual"—how much energy the machine would have used without the intervention—proving the 5% saving for the tax credit.

Geo-Strategy: The Ticino-Italy Innovation Axis

For Snaption, based in Ticino, the "geo" in the user request is pivotal. The relationship between the Swiss Canton of Ticino and the Italian industrial north (Lombardy, Piedmont, Veneto) is a powerful engine for this transition.

Ticino: The Incubator of Precision

Switzerland, and Ticino specifically, has cultivated an ecosystem intensely focused on high-value innovation.

• Fondazione Agire: As the innovation agency for the canton, Agire facilitates the transfer of knowledge from research institutes (like SUPSI/USI) to startups.²⁵

• LInn (Legge per l'innovazione economica): This cantonal law provides incentives for companies developing innovative products and processes.³⁸ It supports the supply side of the equation, helping companies like Snaption engineer robust, "Swiss Made" industrial tools.

• Swiss Quality: In the industrial market, the "Swiss" label connotes reliability, precision, and longevity, attributes highly valued by manufacturing clients who are risk-averse regarding their machinery.¹⁹

• USI Startup Centre: The centre hosts and accelerates technology-driven startups, offering access to mentoring, industry networks, and research connections with USI.

Italy: The Market of Adoption

Just across the border lies one of Europe's largest manufacturing belts, currently stimulated by the massive Transizione 5.0 liquidity.

• The Synergy: Italian companies are hungry for technologies that enable them to access the 45% tax credit. However, they need reliable, certifiable solutions.

• The Opportunity: A Ticino-based company (Snaption) serves as the bridge. It uses Swiss R&D capabilities to build the rigorous measurement tools required by Italian bureaucracy. The geographic proximity allows for rapid deployment and support, while the "cross-border" nature allows the client to benefit from European-level incentives using Swiss-level technology.

Bibliography

1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10734266 Embodied carbon vs. operational carbon – One Click LCA

2. https://oneclicklca.com/en-us/resources/articles/embodied-carbon-vs-operational-carbon Industrial Remanufacturing Dramatically Cuts Emissions, Material Use, and Production Costs – Sustainability Directory

3. https://news.sustainability-directory.com/circularity/industrial-remanufacturing-dramatically-cuts-emissions-material-use-and-production-costs Industry 5.0 – European Commission

4. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/industrial-research-and-innovation/industry-50_en Industry 5.0: A Transformative Vision for Europe – ESIR Policy Brief

5. https://www.horizon-europe.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/2022-01/industry-5-0-pdf-5324.pdf Used vs. New Industrial Equipment Market: Making the Right Choice – AM Industria

6. https://www.amindustrialmachinery.com/used-vs-new-industrial-equipment-market-comparison Integrating IoT With Legacy Equipment – IoT For All

7. https://www.iotforall.com/retrofitting-legacy-equipment-iot[8] Extending product lifecycle and reducing environmental impact – LONGTIME Label

8. https://longtimelabel.com/en/news/extending-product-lifecycle-and-reducing-environmental-impact From Waste to Worth: Product Life Extension – Circular Innovation Council

9. https://circularinnovation.ca/circular-business-models-product-life-extension Carbon Footprint of Manufacturing Processes – MDPI

10. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/10/9/1858 Understanding Life Cycle Assessments – Dell

11. https://www.delltechnologies.com/asset/en-us/products/multi-product/industry-market/pcf-lca-whitepaper.pdf Environmental Analysis of Milling Machine Tool Use – eScholarship

12. https://escholarship.org/content/qt9ct6f6d2/qt9ct6f6d2_noSplash_f462f59a2998cbed105e6af0189a8b8c.pdf How CNC Technology Reduces the Carbon Footprint of Manufacturing – Timay CNC

13. https://www.timaycnc.com/blog/cnc-machining-carbon-footprint-reduction/[14] Detailed Process – AssessCCUS

14. https://assessccus.globalco2initiative.org/lca/detailed-process/ Comparative LCA of Reconstruction vs Renovation in Buildings – ResearchGate

15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395653324_Comparative_Life_Cycle_Assessment_of_Reconstruction_and_Renovation_for_Carbon_Reduction_in_Buildings Comparing AM vs Machining via Life-Cycle Assessment – Faludi

16. http://faludidesign.com/work/publications/Faludi_2015--3DP_vs_Machining_LCA.pdf Machine Retrofit Explained (2025 Guide) – Tenco Engineering

17. https://tencoengineering.pk/machine-retrofit-guide/ Cost Guide to ROI in Industrial Oven Retrofit and Repair – PQ Oven

18. https://www.pqovens.com/retrofit-and-repair-cost-guide-industrial-oven/[19] Transforming Factories: Industrial Automation and IoT – OMCH

19. https://www.omch.com/industrial-automation-and-iot/ Transizione 5.0 – Circolare Operativa – MIMIT

20. https://www.mimit.gov.it/images/stories/normativa/Circolare_Operativa_Transizione_5.0_mimit.AOO_PI.REGISTRO_UFFICIALEI.0025877.16-08-2024.pdf Transizione 5.0: FAQ – GSE

21. https://www.gse.it/servizi-per-te/attuazione-misure-pnrr/transizione-5-0/pillole-informative Non-Invasive Current Sensors for Submetering – DataIntelo

22. https://dataintelo.com/report/non-invasive-current-sensors-for-submetering-market Non-Intrusive Low-Cost IoT System for Predictive Maintenance – MDPI

23. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/14/14/2913 Retrofitting Legacy Industrial Equipment with IoT – Promwad

24. https://promwad.com/news/retrofit-industrial-equipment-iot-security Transizione 5.0: how energy savings are calculated – IRIDay

25. https://www.iriday.it/transizione-5-0-come-si-calcola-il-risparmio-energetico Fondazione Agire e Deutelio – Ticino Welcome

26. https://ticinowelcome.ch/banche-e-imprese/industria-e-artigianato/fondazione-agire-e-deutelio-la-fusione-unenergia-pulita-per-il-futuro Agenzia per l'innovazione e l'imprenditorialità – Agire

27. https://agire.ch/chi-siamo

28. Ente Regionale per lo Sviluppo – Locarnese e Vallemaggia https://locarnese.ch/consulenza/innovazione-economica

29. Legge per l'innovazione economica – Ticino https://www4.ti.ch/dfe/de/uac/versamento-dei-sussidi/legge-per-linnovazione-economica